11-22-2017, 04:48 PM
It seems there's something strange regarding tools recognizing control points with either HitData or cursorHitData. I have better luck when the hit request asks only for control points (in and out) or when the tolerance is increased to 4 or more. A cursor is more likely to recognize a control point at 100% or smaller, while zoomed in to, say, 400% it usually can't detect a control point. When it does, it senses the control point several pixels below the actual control point. Recognizing anchor points and segment interiors works flawlessly. Is there a trick to get more reliable results?